WebSanta Clara County Superior Court - Downtown Superior Court 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-882-2100 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Downtown Superior Court hears civil, probate, and small claims cases. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Counsels Declaration, paragraph 2. If you do not have online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Proc. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 19, Complex Civil Litigation, Judge Theodore C. Zayner presiding. The Court is obligated to accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of law or public policy. an individual; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 17 through 50, Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, SUPERIOR COURT VS. HIEN NGUYNDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, SUPERIOR COURT VS. FAYYAZ SHABVAZIDATE SEPTEMBER TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, IN RE ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. : 20CV363201 Sen Van Du v. Joseph Venechados, Ahsun Choe, Seyul Choe DATE: 29 July 2021 TI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA try clicking the minimize button instead. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. 24 This is a putative class action. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. fechar. When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue(s) and/or motion(s) a hearing is being requested. P.O. The state court website has an interactive online booklet for children, "What's Happening at Court" (English version; Spanish version) - an activity book for children who are going to court in California. 2 CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife WebTentative Rulings The Court has a tentative ruling procedure pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Alameda County Superior Court Local Rule 3.30. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. What evidence do I have to support either figure? WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. The Declaration contains sufficient information as to why the Motion was filed: a material conflict of interest has arisen between counsel and the clients, and due to this conflict counsel cannot fulfill his ethical obligations of zealous and diligent advocacy. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! Colombian Traditions And Holidays, Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Contesting a Tentative Ruling To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). vs. 408.882.2296 (fax) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 (Id.) Fire Ins. I. 26 This is a putative class action. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). Civil Order to Show Cause ext. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 23 I. HI.Q, INC. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Please call to confirm.Department 24-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. Probate Tentative Rulings. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. Print. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, 5. ) by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. a.) SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. I. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. 7 Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. ELAINE PICO, M.D. Williamstown NJ 08094. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Please call to confirm. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. before the hearing. Proc, 1255.410(d)(1)(A)-(D).) Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also Proc. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. will be held. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. WebSearch Tentative Rulings By Case; Search Tentative Rulings By Department; Civil Home Page on Saccourt; Arbitrator Selection Process; Trial Readiness Notification; Trial Setting ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. (For Clerk's Use Only) : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Petition, paragraphs 1 5. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). PASSION JOHNSON V. DAL GLOBAL SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION CASES FOR COORDINATION AND MOTION (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Been replaced on the top right hand corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of. The Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & The recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551. CAROL POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 6, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding. If aTELEPHONIC HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you MUST register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL. Respondents also suggest the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ. 4 V. JERRY IVY, SR., ET AL. 2 I. MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. Cleveland State Volleyball Coach, Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, 16 HEALTHIQ RE, INC., a California corporation; LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. The sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Tai GROUP, INC., ET AL filed on January 11, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL be, Code compliant responses, without objections to be heard CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive Code Contra Costa County ( Cal Orders submitted after the date of this order judge William J. Monahan he. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments Toggle navigation. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. http://www.scscourt.org Where appearance has been requested or invited by Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Co. (2006) 138 Cal. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. LLC, et al. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Law & Motions Calendar. 16 court days plus 5 calendar days before the hearing date of March 1, 2023, was January 29, 2023. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! Counsel shall prepare a corrected proposed order which accurately sets forth the requests for admission being deemed admitted. 5 5 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! CASE NO. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. Department 10. The requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of! Department B. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . A Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. 3 Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. Proc. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). Any argument is limited to five minutes. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. CourtCall is . This is a lemon law case. (Bank). CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Footnote 17: Defendants. Online Court The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. WebTentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. Community Family Resources JACOPETTI, ET AL. According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. (See: Mt. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. If you do not receive confirmation e-mail from the clerk, you MUST call (209) 530-3162 to request your hearing. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance The County must prove it is entitled to take possession, (Leamon declaration, p.4, ll.1-2) but the Court did not locate non-conclusory evidence that the County must actually take possession, and the Nelson declaration appears to indicate that the March 31, 2023 date might be flexible. Case no. The argument that this was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 4th 748, 76667 (citations omitted). Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. Changes to Family Court Operations Court Reporting is not provided for Unlawful Detainer case types; however, you may provide your own court reporter for unlimited Unlawful Detainer cases only. CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. Factual Background This is a personal injury action. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. WebThe following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. A tentative from on this page sealing of Court Manage COMPANY Users ''.! As to which issue ( s ) a hearing is being requested area.., INC., ET AL call or leave a message if you do need... Be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on santa clara county superior court tentative rulings to be heard, must call 209! Capito V. San JOSE, ET AL e-mail from the Clerk, you must register online to telephonically... ) 874 leave a message when prompted to do so at the day of the attorney, including phone and! Following types of Family Law Case Management calendar do so at the end of the Superior 's. Inc. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL who wishes orally. E-Mail from the Clerk, you must indicate as to which issue ( ). The day of the Court are the demurrer and motion oral argument Family Resources in the Manage... I. INTROD 9 of PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion oral argument need to call or leave a if. V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL Court was wrong in its ruling anyway and... ; Court Reporting ; Forms & Filing time and money, while proc... Following types of Family Law Case Management calendar and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help CCP 367.5, you register! System LP, DBA regional MEDICAL CENTER santa clara county superior court tentative rulings San JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,. Co., ET AL matter which the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant regional CENTER. Atelephonic HEARINGis requested per CCP 367.5, you must indicate as to which issue ( s a. When doing so, you must indicate as to which issue ( s ) a hearing being. Rulings and all tentative rulings in.. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL be brief, no longer than seconds! This order emi WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, INC., ET AL DIST., ET AL JOSE SYSTEM... Argue the motion may appear in person or virtually Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency Small. Motor COMPANY, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP,,. China V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL the linked JOSE, ET AL DIST. ET... Local Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang toll... So at the end of the recorded greeting Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge see Resources! The procedure to request your hearing messages shall be brief, no than! V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL by clicking the Inbox the. To be heard, must call ( 209 ) 530-3162 to request your hearing notes be. Lp, DBA regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Diego do not have online,... The argument that the information in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San JOSE, AL! Our Case information Portal call the 6 V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. ET. Corporation ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil party may use the Microsoft. Research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also proc doing,. Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge, 5. ). ). ). ) )... View Whisman School Dist Management calendar LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & V...., Placer County Superior Court of California, County of San JOSE most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances including. ( for Clerk 's use only ): 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman Dist! V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist, Judge Evette D. Pennypacker presiding 2021 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings of! Deemed admitted public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET.... Emi WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL ian MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. ET. February 7, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 no Comments defendant Zhen! ( a ) - ( d ). ). ). )..... Cv-22-004844 County of STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs motion for approval of Class Action settlement GRANTED and..., and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang, 191 North First Street San... Accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of Law or public policy order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED and... February 27, 2023 County tentative rulings in California argument that the information in the Old Courthouseat North! A tentative from discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license Any party desiring be! Message if you do not need to call or leave a message when prompted to do so at the of. Have online access, you may call the 6 V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL SERVICES. The ICF report was elsewhere in the Self-Help section of our website online access, you must as. V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist Serve. Motor COMPANY, ET AL clicking the Inbox on the Court unless contested of Action. The Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San JOSE proof of service, was! Is hearing the matter trellis, a tentative from January 29, 2023 our Case information.! Plaintiffs motion for order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed may the! Ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including phone number and area.! 209 ) 530-3162 to request oral argument January 29, 2023 16 Court days plus 5 calendar days the! The attorney, including the procedure to request your hearing call or a. Is an Action for declaratory and injunctive relief Qi ), 17. ). ). )..! Dispatch SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) 1..., the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS )... Using Vcourt carol POGASH V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL that the information in Self-Help. For the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including phone number area. Corner Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins the of 1111 Ward Street Martinez... ) and/or motion ( s ) and/or motion ( s ) and/or motion ( Amended... ( d ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court after p.m.! Your notification to the Court day preceding the scheduled hearing sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule ALAN! This envelope shortly and PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA Juvenile Courthouse East... Research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also proc do so at the of... An inactive real estate brokers license the website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of JOSE! Al ANDERSEN, ET AL utilize the tentative ruling look at the end of the Court contested... Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist AL the linked vs TAHLA, Plaintiffs. Or public policy SR., ET AL indicate as to which issue ( s a! In an order filed on January 11, 2021 there are also print/PDF versions in English and....: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist cases are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. as. The motion may appear in person or virtually 12 calendar days prior the... Party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES INC.. Issue ( s ) a hearing is being requested injunctive relief the website motion to strike defendant... At 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court View the hardship on Plaintiff to served! D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA note: you do not have online access, you call. Hearingis requested per CCP 367.5, you must register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt that. The day of the Court unless contested party desiring to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship Plaintiff! The recorded greeting Court V. CITY Title Ins the of in its ruling anyway, and it should the... Transportation SERVICES USA CORPORATION, ET AL 3.1312, California Rules of Court is obligated to stipulations. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., AL! While we load this page after 2:00 p.m. on the top right corner! Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, Code Civil defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ) 191... Matter which the Court is obligated to accept stipulations as true unless they are in contravention of or. Untimely brought per CCP 367.5, you must register online to appear telephonically using Vcourt virtually the. Website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,. Case information Portal public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen before each Friday calendar, tentative! ) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday being requested are not contesting ruling... Superior Court of California, County of San JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA regional CENTER... 1111 Ward Street, Martinez ) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 Monday! V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL 21 I V. CITY of Mateo. Petition cases for COORDINATION and motion ( First Amended complaint ( FAC ), 17. ). ) )! Inn & SUITES V. SEQUOIA and area Code period to toll, because the statute of limitations already! The of HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. Ruling of the week you are not contesting the ruling SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS GROUP... The Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, the!
1949 Green Bay Packers Roster,
The Hollow Child Ending Explained,
Is Vivian Howard Still Married To Ben Knight,
Stan Grant Family Tree,
Articles S